English 
Português
Software can be an engineering masterpiece, with clean code and flawless architecture, and still fail at the moment of use. This happens because, while the developer builds logical paths so that features can exist, the end user navigates these paths with specific goals, a sense of urgency, and often a personal logic that defies any manual. It is in this gap between “how it was built” and “what it is for” that the Quality Analyst (QA) becomes a key player.
The code works, but does the experience flow?
Ensuring a button executes its programmed function is the bare minimum of technical verification. However, true quality goes beyond syntax. A QA who focuses solely on the developer’s perspective risks validating systems that are technically operational but functionally frustrating.
Thinking like a user requires empathy. It means predicting that someone might try to finish a purchase on an unstable connection or that a form field might receive completely unexpected data. According to Capgemini’s World Quality Report 2023-24, 67% of organizations now prioritize customer experience as the primary objective of their testing strategies. This reinforces that a product’s success is not measured only by the absence of technical bugs, but by the satisfaction of the person using it at the finish line.
Human reasoning against the unexpected
Traditional automation is excellent for repeating exhaustive tasks, yet it is inherently rigid. It follows the exact script the developer wrote. The problem is that real users don’t follow scripts. They click “back” in the middle of a transaction, open multiple simultaneous tabs, and interrupt critical flows.
The QA brings the human reasoning necessary to test these chaotic scenarios. This sensitivity identifies when a layout change, even if it didn’t break the code, made the journey confusing. The human eye detects usability nuances that a binary script ignores. Studies indicate that software failures impacting user experience can be costly; The Cost of Poor Software Quality in the US (2022) report estimates that the cost of low software quality in the US reached US$ 2.41 trillion, driven largely by operational failures and inefficient legacy systems.
Test automation for more efficiency
For a QA to focus on this strategic and human thinking, they need to break free from the shackles of heavy, bureaucratic automation. This is where TestBooster.ai comes in as the ideal ally. Instead of spending hours writing complex lines of code for a simple test, the professional uses a platform that automates tests with AI.
TestBooster.ai allows tests to be described in natural language. If you need to validate whether a user can reset their password, you simply describe the intent. The AI translates this into resilient automated scenarios. Unlike old models that break every time a developer changes a button’s ID, the platform’s AI understands the context and the goal of the flow, making tests much less brittle.
From technical to strategic
Centralizing quality initiatives allows the QA to stop being a “bug hunter” and become a product strategist. TestBooster.ai eliminates report fragmentation and offers managers a clear view of business risk, rather than just a list of technical errors.
When the QA utilizes an infrastructure that automates the repetitive and ensures execution during peak hours or after every deploy, they gain time to do what the machine cannot yet do: challenge the product from the perspective of those who will pay for it.
How about transforming your testing strategy today? Get to know TestBooster.ai and discover how our platform can centralize your quality operation with the intelligence your business demands.
